Skip to content
Premier League
Premier League

Matches / Week 22

Tabiat and Mehregan Noor 3–0

Wednesday, January 29 · 16:00Final
Tabiat

3

3 League points

Mehregan Noor

0

0 League points

Set flow

The score gap at the start, at each technical timeout and at the end of every set. Above the line the home side led, below it the visitors.

TabiatMehregan Noor
  1. Set 123–25

  2. Set 217–25

  3. Set 320–25

Instagram card

Match reportIran Premier Volleyball LeagueWeek 220–3Mehregan NoorTabiat23–2517–2520–25Block77Aces33Kill %47.4%66.2%Attack efficiency28.9%50.0%Reception efficiency55.0%64.1%Transition kill %50.0%60.0%Side-out kill %46.4%68.8%Iran Premier Volleyball League
  • Block: Tabiat 7, Mehregan Noor 7
  • Aces: Tabiat 3, Mehregan Noor 3
  • Kill %: Tabiat 66.2%, Mehregan Noor 47.4%
  • Attack efficiency: Tabiat 50.0%, Mehregan Noor 28.9%
  • Reception efficiency: Tabiat 64.1%, Mehregan Noor 55.0%
  • Transition kill %: Tabiat 60.0%, Mehregan Noor 50.0%
  • Side-out kill %: Tabiat 68.8%, Mehregan Noor 46.4%

Points mix

How attack, block, and serve split the points in this match.

  • Attack

    81.8%

    45

  • Block

    12.7%

    7

  • Serve

    5.5%

    3

  1. Scorer 1Yunes Ghelich Niazi15

    Attack 100.0%, Block 0.0%, Serve 0.0%

  2. Scorer 2Hamzeh Zarini12

    Attack 91.7%, Block 8.3%, Serve 0.0%

  3. Scorer 3Mohamad Amin Mosanna12

    Attack 91.7%, Block 8.3%, Serve 0.0%

Match report

SetTimeRunning scoreResult · home on the right
127 min4–8 · 13–16 · 18–2123–25
225 min6–8 · 12–16 · 16–2117–25
327 min6–8 · 14–16 · 18–2120–25
PlayerSetPointsServeReceptionAttackBlock
No.Name123Total pointsBreak pointsPoint differenceAttemptsErrorsPointsAttemptsErrorsPositive reception %Perfect reception %AttemptsErrorsBlockedPointsSuccess %Points
1Yunes Ghelich Niazi333153+8133·····25·41560.0%·
5Mohammad Fallah55562+5111·····7··571.4%1
6Mehrab Maleki··252+56·2····3··266.7%1
7Hamzeh Zarini444125+4105·2·0.0%0.0%14121178.6%1
9Radin Ahmadi22·51+57··1·0.0%0.0%5··5100.0%·
13Mohammad Reza Mashhadi11141-114··23156.5%34.8%1031330.0%1
18Mohammmad Vadi66674+681·····4··4100.0%3
20Majid Zeynali··11+14·1··········
L 21Arman Salehi··-2···25276.0%40.0%······
Player totals5519+317310351362.7%35.3%68474566.2%7
Set 125Opp. 7253019357.9%31.6%22321568.2%3
Set 225Opp. 5243115080.0%46.7%23021878.3%1
Set 325Opp. 8244217052.9%29.4%23131252.2%3
PlayerSetPointsServeReceptionAttackBlock
No.Name123Total pointsBreak pointsPoint differenceAttemptsErrorsPointsAttemptsErrorsPositive reception %Perfect reception %AttemptsErrorsBlockedPointsSuccess %Points
L 2Rafe Tabari··-1···10160.0%40.0%······
3Faruq Googhcheli·611051··········1
4Amir Hosein Navi16·63+36··21·52.4%23.8%912444.4%2
6Seyed Eisa Naseri21581+71011····9··777.8%·
9Yousof Kazemi54284+51111····1011440.0%3
10Amir Pazhooman····-1·······2·1·0.0%·
11Amin Najafi65···04············
12Siavash Mardani323102-21051····2552936.0%·
L 16Mostafa Heydari···0···4·25.0%25.0%······
17Zamani Amirreza··11·-23··420.0%0.0%3·1133.3%·
18Mohamad Amin Mosanna434122+11111·24·45.8%20.8%18··1161.1%1
20Moien Gharanjik····-111···········
Player totals4613+196110363346.0%23.8%76773647.4%7
Set 123Opp. 6234322059.1%31.8%27231244.4%2
Set 217Opp. 3183021142.9%19.0%22111254.5%2
Set 320Opp. 5203020235.0%20.0%27431244.4%3

Tabiat

Setter rotation

Rot.WonLostDiffAttackReception
61510+584.6%66.7%
51311+242.9%50.0%
41310+343.8%56.7%
31411+350.0%63.3%
2118+350.0%71.4%
189-125.0%74.1%
Reception
5136 side-out points
Receptions per side-out point
1.42
Serve
7319 break points
Serves per break point
3.84

Attack by situation

First attack after a positive reception (+#)

ErrBlkKill %Att
Home2268.8%32
Away2257.1%28

First attack after a negative reception (!-)

ErrBlkKill %Att
Home0271.4%14
Away4333.3%27

Attack after a dig

ErrBlkKill %Att
Home2260.0%20
Away1250.0%20

Mehregan Noor

Setter rotation

Rot.WonLostDiffAttackReception
61316-336.4%63.0%
51114-353.8%51.3%
4911-220.0%48.1%
3712-5-9.1%53.3%
21011-110.0%53.3%
1910-150.0%54.2%
Reception
6333 side-out points
Receptions per side-out point
1.91
Serve
6113 break points
Serves per break point
4.69